|
| |
PAT RILEY & PHIL JACKSON.
Term Paper ID:24561
|
|
|
Essay Subject:
Compares rival professional basketball coaches' philosophies of life & sports, techniques, influences, backgrounds, leadership.... More...
|
6 Pages / 1350 Words
5 sources, 7 Citations,
APA Format
$24.00
Return to List of Papers
|
Paper Abstract:
Compares rival professional basketball coaches' philosophies of life & sports, techniques, influences, backgrounds, leadership.
Paper Introduction:
Pat Riley and Phil Jackson could not have more different styles of leadership and coaching in the National Basketball Association. This research examines some of the key differences in their leadership styles and notes the conflicts that have arisen from those differences.
During one championship game against the Bulls, Pat Riley erupted. Two quick technical fouls sent him to the dressing room, necessitating a long walk from one end of the floor to the other, right past the Chicago Bulls bench. With every step Riley took, Bulls Coach Phil Jackson's face tightened. He tried to look down, then away. Jackson was trying not to laugh and everybody could see it. As Riley finally passed the Bulls and disappeared, Jackson could not help himself any longer. He laughed. Actually, it was more like a giggle. They still cannot play nice, Jackson
Text of the Paper:
The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper.
The obvious joy his players experience becomes a powerful motivatingforce, a feeling that comes from deep within, not from some frenzied coachpacing along the sidelines. I'mmore a Tao of the basketball world and Pat Riley is perhaps more of aGeneral Patton of the basketball world" (Mariotti, 1996, p. Keep Ball Out of Paint. (1996, March 6). In postseason, Miami was blitzedby the Chicago Bulls 3- . He added that one of the most importantqualities of a leader is listening without judgment: "When I back off andjust listen, I get much better results on the court" (Jackson, 1995). 58). (1995). He fits peopleinto the formula well, and he's got a real defensive philosophy that Ithink has been manifested since he's come into his second career as acoach. Each playerhad a category in which he could potentially rank first. 4). In his first season with the Heat, Riley set aboutrevamping the roster, making a host of moves that totally changed the lookof the team and also cleared the way for future free agent signings. Clearly, Pat Riley and Phil Jackson have very different leadershipstyles. New York: Hyperion.Mariotti, J. New York: Sagamore Publishing.Jackson, P. And he's got a power basis for his basketball game. But it must berecognized that both coaches have had stellar careers in the NBA. ReferencesBryant, A. It spurred several players, most notably A. He not only positions the spokes of his gameplan, he pays attention to the spaces between the spokes, just the waygreat composers are mindful of the silence between notes. . Phil Jackson, son of Pentecostal ministers, succeeds because heenlists the hearts and minds of a wildly disparate group of players (readparishioners). Pat Riley also offers "rules" for living and winning,such as "Shoulda, coulda, and woulda won't get it done" and "Givingyourself permission to lose guarantees a loss." Many observers say thatPhil Jackson's ruminations in his book were more original than Pat Riley'smotivational exhortations, but that Riley's book would be somewhat morepractical for most readers. Riley is more structured, more demanding and more physical. Pastors give lengthy directions on the proper administrationof the Eucharist or on how high the processional cross should be held. Despite his "tough guy" image, Riley always sought new ways to buildthe team and get the best out of his players. Riley had writtenthis on the board in the Heat's locker room: "No layups. "It was a direct threat to authority. Thisresearch examines some of the key differences in their leadership stylesand notes the conflicts that have arisen from those differences. 4.Rosen, C. (1994). "I was farmore effective when I balanced the masculine and feminine side of mynature," Jackson wrote in his book. Jackson was trying not tolaugh and everybody could see it. Greenand Magic Johnson (league MVP that year), who turned in career seasons.Riley compiled his best mark as a coach at 65-17. Brown, Voshon Lenard and Isaac Austinin 1996-97, and with a career year by Hardaway and a solid season byMourning, the Heat won a franchise-record 61 games and the AtlanticDivision crown. C. If it does, the path is good. With every step Riley took, Bulls Coach Phil Jackson's facetightened. The system even measured such elementsas shot contesting. In contrastwith previous methods of ranking players, which had compared them to theirteammates, CBE compared them to opponents at the same position. D1). Along the way, Jackson called Riley "the originalwhiner" and a "media coach." Riley didn't shake hands after that series andJackson said in Melissa Issacson's book, Transition Game, that Riley'sapproach is to make the referee make all the foul calls, knowing they willnot do that. For these people, everything must flow from the top.Bishops afflicted with this syndrome write letters to priests decreeingthat, upon a bishop's arrival for confirmation, priests must vest in aseparate room. The differences in leadership style between the two NBA coaches isreflected in their "chalk talk" before one playoff game. For example, Riley developed astatistical approach--similar to the benchmarking practices used at manybusinesses--for measuring his players' performance against those of theirpeers in the league. During one championship game against the Bulls, Pat Riley erupted.Two quick technical fouls sent him to the dressing room, necessitating along walk from one end of the floor to the other, right past the ChicagoBulls bench. "Flak flies when 'Tao' and 'Patton'collide." Chicago Sun-Times, p. Later, Jacksoncalled the laugh a moment of relaxation and suggested it was a reaction tothe absurdity of a truly absurd game. So far, Riley's book has been the biggerseller. We, ourselves, are good fortune.--Walt Whitman" (Rosen, 1996, p. He understandsthat no vision can become a reality until it is owned by every member ofthe group. My coaching philosophy is perhaps more structured offense and a lotof liberties and freedoms inside of it for a team which has a lot of open-endedness. "The game room." Sport, 87, 58-6 . Evenin code, they are every bit as quarrelsome as Miami's Alonzo Mourning andChicago's Scottie Pippen, which is saying something. Pressure and BodyTheme. Herealizes that no one can create a successful parish alone, no matter howgifted he is. When interviewed about the difference in their philosophies, Jacksonsaid: "Well, I think Pat has a lot of rules and a lot of structure to histeam. Try it as manytimes as you think necessary, Castaneda suggests. Much of what passes for leadership is a kind of social engineeringthat dictates every move and motivational technique, but does nothing tomove the heart. Jackson is a Zen Christian. Pat Riley and Phil Jackson could not have more different styles ofleadership and coaching in the National Basketball Association. He gives his players freedom to discover what worksand what does not, to think more for themselves. . According to Jackson, many coaches--like Pat Riley--arecontroloholics. D1.Issacson, M. Jacksonis more open, more tolerant and more communitarian. The Knicks contested hishiring, and Miami agreed to send a first-round draft pick and cash to NewYork as settlement. It was, 'We're going totake the spirit of the game and play the way we want to play it.' In thatregard, 'Winning at All Costs' should be the name of his book rather than,'The Winner Within.' That's what I saw as Pat's drive" (Issacson, 1994, pp.123-125). Citing Carlos Castaneda's The Teaching of Don Juan, he instructs hisplayers to look at everything closely and deliberately. Inthis widely used style of leadership, a chief executive establishes rules,structures, values and performance measures and clearly defines what isexpected of every employee. But there is no running from thesubplot here, the psychological games being played between these two. Jackson is different. Two journeyman players whose careers were once sosimilar have become complete opposites. Sacred hoops: Spiritual lessons of a hardwoodwarrior. They still cannot play nice, Jacksonand Riley, even after all these years, all those championships betweenthem. Feelings between the two coaches started to go sour in 1992 whenRiley took over the Knicks and pushed the defending champion Bulls to aseven-game series. And allow the players to growas individuals as they surrender themselves to the group effort. Moderate,sustained improvement was the key. D1). Find a structure thatwould empower everybody, not just the stars. He laughed.Actually, it was more like a giggle. After encountering one's pastor, one should alwaysunderstand a little more about why one is alive. (1996, December). In its first several months in bookstores, sales of The WinnerWithin, published in 1993, led the early sales pace of Sacred Hoopspublished in 1995, by a 2-to-1 ratio, according to Ingram Book Company, thelargest book wholesaler in America (Bryant, 1996, p. After the Knicks were eliminated by Indianain the Eastern Conference Semifinals in 1995, Riley resigned with one yearremaining on his contract and accepted a lucrative offer from the MiamiHeat to become part-owner as well as head coach. "Business advice from the sidelines." NewYork Times, p. Pat Riley, by contrast, employs the "box approach" to leadership. One Shot." Down the hall, Jackson hadtranscribed a more cosmic message: "Henceforth, we seek not good fortune.tune. But Riley got tremendous mileagefrom unheralded players such as P.J. Jackson's "triple-post" offense may be the most complicated inthe NBA; Riley runs one of the most basic offenses in basketball. In Jackson's words: being aware is more important than beingsmart (Jackson, 1995). (1996, April 28). Riley has his "Force Basketball"and Jackson believes in the "natural rhythms of momentum," among otherthings Zen. Transition game. The rivalry between Jackson and Riley had Michael Jordan shaking hishead in wonderment. As Riley finally passed the Bulls anddisappeared, Jackson could not help himself any longer. Following the season, Riley continued to revamp the Heat's roster,although his attempted signing of Juwan Howard as a free agent was voidedby the league as a salary cap violation. He uses such Zen-like words as"interconnectedness" and "mindfulness." He urges his charges to payattention to what is actually happening, to become more attuned to eachother. He does not try to keep his parishioners guessing in themisguided notion that such nonsense is a way to stimulate creativity. Riley now coaches the Miami Heat instead of the New York Knicks, butthe rivalry between the two appears as charged as ever. In themeantime, he maintained his record of never posting a losing record orfailing to make the playoffs as Miami, featuring Alonzo Mourning at centerand Tim Hardaway at point guard, finished at 42-4 and gained the lastEastern Conference playoff spot that year. Riley isthe star wherever he goes. If it does not, it isof no use. Riley cannot be ignored. Riley is Armani, Jackson is less glamorous(Bryant, 1996, p. Whereas,Pat's the kind of person who gets down to work and has a reason for it. And perhaps a lot more effort to have an enjoyability at thejob level and an elimination of the work presence in the job. He tried to look down, then away. At the start of the 1986-87season, he unveiled a program called Career Best Effort (CBE). Then ask yourself: Doesthis path have a heart?
If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again:
or
Click here to request an essay written just for you.
|
|
|
