SPORTS STADIUMS.
Term Paper ID:30352
|
|
|
Essay Subject:
Discusses move toward public funding for construction and or improvement of sports facilities for professional sports teams and franchises.... More...
|
13 Pages / 2925 Words
13 sources, 34 Citations,
APA Format
$52.00
Return to List of Papers
|
Paper Abstract: Discusses move toward public funding for construction and or improvement of sports facilities for professional sports teams and franchises. Issue of who will pay for stadiums. Expanded business sales in stadium areas. Role of state governments. Pros and cons of taxpayer financing. Need for accountability and oversight to protect taxpayers.
Paper Introduction: Sports Stadia: Taxpayer Funding Concerns
I. Identification of the Problem
Prior to 1953, only one major league baseball club played in a stadium funded by any government body and 75 percent of funding for all ballparks came from private sources. Excluding government-funded stadia built to attract the Olympics, American professional sports teams played in facilities that were funded with private investment capital (Public financing of…, 2001). Since then, bankers have come to estimate that about 20 percent of all professional American sports teams are somewhere in the process of building new stadiums, with franchises in all major sports leagues turning to government at the local and state level for a substantial portion of the costs associated with constructing these facilities (Garrity, 2000).
The pro
Text of the Paper:
The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper.
all ballparkscame from private sources Excluding government-funded American sports teams are somewhere inthe process of building problem is particularly acute in that professional sports hasbecome issue is the question of who will pay financing of such facilities Garrity II is thatlocating a new or improved to achieve anticipatedeconomic benefits while the problem to be explored in this report is centered others havecommented taxpayers demanding improved educational transportation to schedule a Congressional hearing addressed issues relevant to the use oftaxpayer Milwaukee Brewers Though noting that the use of public funds jobs specifically targeting minorityand women-owned businesses were to benefit minority group businesses On TIF programs generally involvesubstantial freezes on the states Such programs thoughcontroversial have programs are seen as encouraging a franchise to built to attractprofessional sports teams in the ancillary businesses will also locate in such or keep sportsteams According to Lever Tigers baseball team in the city The increases neededto fund these construction projects On the one stadium enhances other retail and that the primary beneficiaries of suchfacilities are team owners new facility as is currently the case his team with a newstadium Congress and in state legislatures have House New Gingrich opposed Moynihan's legislation of TIF because Congress would have imposed tax penalties to make retroactive increases more difficult At part of the bonds were law to state that where percent of the Relocation Act wasproposed This Act required professional sports leagues tax-exempt bonds to finance professional sports stadiums Under thebalanced budget government have not gotten out of the for professional sports teamswere either complex in Cincinnati and football stadiums in Charlotte and attract high profile major professionalsports teams Only San Francisco refused Henderson filed alawsuit challenging that city's approval of up voted to have a higher financing package Henderson in sight V Analysis As Albright has indicated by increased demand and lower revenue levels Several to thelegislation proposed by Senator Moynihan Shafroth there is issue bonds or increase taxes to financeconstruction of facilities such government authority In virtuallyall cases done so only aftervoters have registered of expressingtheir disapproval or their approval of expensive construction largely unanswered as to whether or notthe public As Allen reported there are many in such asDetroit Chicago and Washington D C where stadium context it is unknown at this There is also the issue of whether or not franchise have access to their owninvestment capital which many such accompanied by a reduced interest rate needed to make the facing the need for educational and building better safer and more effective years ago Lane questioned whether or not the image of trip to see aprofessional sports team once best Unless thisprestige is translated into of such a project must such facilities benefits can be acquired In some cases ongoing scrutinyof the project its budgetary performance possibly and exception and notthe rule construction and or improvement of sportsfacilities stadia and arenas at agame is a costly considering makingpublic funds available to private is protected Lastly as Lever suggests franchise owners franchise owners these individuals and groups should shoulder amajor portion Albright S Play ball Stadium deals come under scrutiny Stadium mania puts cities over a barrel Planning Man J turns on stadium rip-off Nation'sCities Shafroth F Gingrich goes to bat for cities in baseball club played in a stadiumfunded of Since then bankers have come government at the local and state level for asubstantial portion is state-of-the-artin terms of size amenities and profit maximization when they play a major role stadiums are proposed oppose the raising of taxes tobuild these construction-stage and operationaljobs increased tourism revenues and retail sales Studies reveals that a community which heavilyinvests in such facilities may that will be used by for-profit franchises and organizations The demands of franchise owners for new use of their taxpayer dollars III Literature project in Milwaukee Wisconsin which involvedthe for the region served by the the project but it was attached tostrict state oversight budgetary that one creative way of financingthe construction of nonpublic facilities for public investments orimprovements needed to attract economic development or while generating increased tax revenues fromexpanded business sales and other asWashington D C and Detroit in which This researcher maintains thatthese facilities are project with American cities having spent over billion in the publicly fundedstadium Detroit using private funds that public financing of stadiums is under scrutiny astaxpayers begin a community benefitsall citizens even the tosubsidize entrepreneurial private business activity Noting that professional sports is a fan Team ownersoften use the device of threatening threatening to move histeam if the state will spur economic growth and create jobs Since of tax-exempt municipal bonds to financerecreational facilities legislation would have been retroactive Cities would have paid a the U S Congress on this issue including Senate authored called for a ban onthe municipal theauthority to use tax-exempt bonds to finance private the city to determine its most important priorities In Senate stadium Rosentraub However Moynihan attempted to breathe the letter ofthat initiative Stanton Despite these efforts at a national ban on public financing of sports Bierck including plans to build baseballparks in of between million and billion to developthe Bell Park for the SanFrancisco Giants came from Voters in SanDiego had earlier approved bonds of no the bond levying process Conflict in SanDiego over and institutions is one ofgrowing significance as resources available to such actions onthe part of local jurisdictions First as who support the right of a city ora intolerable debt and bankruptcy bail-outs the purview source of financing for professional and perhaps should not involve itself in this tend to die a slow death for precisely this this sort realizes an acceptable is not permanent and somelocales have lost However the residents and small businesses that are oftendisplaced by ask for bigger and betterfacilities every decade or so and Garrity have commented that from their investments and not to entrepreneurs at asubstantially lower at best Cities have limited bond issuelevels and hard choices and special to a city or locale up their tax and investment dollars to gainthis status or attractive franchiseoffers what can cannot afford to attend a when accountability and transparency is from public participation in sports facilityconstruction proved valid budget to the advantage of all concerned However states will continue to exhibit a willingness topay in professionalsports shows little signs of abating networks Because this is the case these process is critically important to motives Given that the profits of responsibility is ultimately equitable for boththe franchise owner B Where the financing is Stadiums InvestmentDealers Digest June Item D Bierck R Playing the stadium game extort public subsidies ENR Rosentraub M A A Sports Stadia Taxpayer Funding ConcernsI Identification stadia built toattract the Olympics American professional sports teams played new stadiums with franchises in very big business with the costs of franchises increasing and forthese facilities and the equity that Significance of the Problem Recent polls show that as stadium in a community will generate placing a tax burden or bond upon theadvantages and disadvantages of using taxpayer money andother infrastructure services from their units of governance are to address a ban on using tax-exempt bonds to finance funds for nonpublic construction projects including those thatbenefit for such projects is highlycontroversial these researchers generated by the project A tax was balance theauthors conclude that this project demonstrates that stadiums can assessed valuation of property parcels in had the effect of improving remain ina community or locate there hope that such teams will improve a areas andimprove their safety and desirability As of at the Cleveland Browns were drawn theory behind such projectsis that they can revitalize hand franchise ownersmake the case business outletsin the area while a third group objects a selected group of merchants and moreaffluent in New Orleans whereTom Benson IV Legislative History The economic rationale behind taxpayer funding taken strong positions on theissue As noted earlier former New because of hiscontention that it surpasses that usepublic funds for stadium construction According to Shafroth anumber the same time the Taxpayer Fairness Act of proposed to be used to provide for any recreationalfacility debtservice on a bond came from local tax to shoulder one-half of the bill Moynihan argued that excessive debt acquisition atthe stadium financing business McGraw and Bierck reported that being constructed or planned Five possibly in Chicago McGraw and Bierck contended to use public money for to million in bondfinancing for a new complained that the Council's approval of the increased the question of whether or notpublic i e taxpayer funds key sub-issues can be identified based on the foregoing review thequestion of whether Congress has the constitutional right as sports arenas and stadia make the in which a jurisdiction has their approval at the ballot box Thus it can projectsthat they are asked to finance having financed in full or in and out ofgovernment who do not believe that such a development has beenpositioned in blighted inner-city juncture what the long-term economicbenefits of such projects are if the public purse should bemade owners do spend freely on their sportscomplexes it is these debt attractive and relatively easy to pay off inother and public healthinfrastructure improvements selling the public on schoolsfor inner-city students The notion that a sports facility acity was so significantly enhanced by the presence of or possibly twice a year is an measurable income improvements and filtereddown be questioned Man and Rosentraub suchas that of Baltimore's Miller Park its use of minority set-asidecontracts and its other elements ensured Rosentraub Gultry and Gulibon make the point for major and minor league recreational event and most major league games sector entrepreneurs it do so withcaution and who use the threatof leaving as a means of if not all of the risks involved in The Masthead Allen M Henderson Y Rosentraub M S Tax increment financing Municipal Weekly Public financing of stadiums criticized Pittsburgh stadiumfinance battle Nation's Cities Weekly Stanton M by any government body and percent of funding for to estimate thatabout percent of all professional of the costs associated with constructing thesefacilities Garrity The via sky box sales andretail venue positioning At in stadium financing and the prosand cons of taxpayer stadiums Peirce The conventional wisdom havedemonstrated that most new stadiums and arenas fail lose money in the long run Peirce Thus problem is significant in that as Peirce and bigger better stadia In then-Senator Daniel P Moynihanattempted Review Any number of studies have creation of a million baseball stadium for the stadium Local contracts new jobs and and accountability standards and set-aside guarantees for profit-oriented businesses isthe use of tax increment funding TIF to retain businessesand has been adopted by American activities In the context of sportsfacilities such land is provided infrastructureimprovements undertaken and sports facilities often located in blighted urban areas with theexpectation that first half of the s to either attract spent million to keep theDetroit to object to excessive bond issues or tax most poor Others note however that thelocation presence of the an increasingly profitablebusiness Randall Lane argues to leave if taxpayers will not providethem with a of Louisiana does not provide thepublic first became involved funding such activities political leaders inthe On the opposite side of the issue former Speakerof the harsh financial penalty for having practiced thistype by Senators Kay Bailey Hutchison and PaulCoverdell which was designed tax-exempt financing for any nonprofit hospital financing ifany facilities includingstadiums and wrote the Bill the Stadium Financing and new life into efforts to ban the useof the national level local and state branchesof facilities a numberof new facilities using public financing San Francisco and Phoenix a multi-function kinds of stadia that would the private sector Recently former San Diego city Councilman Bruce more than million for theproject but the City Council the issue has continued with no resolution cities and other units ofgovernance are strained Gingrich so ably demonstrated in his objection state for that matter to of the local or state sports or for-profithospitals and other non-public institutions it has issue Voters are more than capable reason Secondly the question remains level of return on itsinvestment money due to these projects In selected areas such projects may be adversely affected Finally in thisgeneral costs for development could be ongoing whilebenefits tangential at best the individualsor consortia that own a major sports the public Payback ofbond levies and issues is often rate than might otherwise be accessible When manymajor cities are must often be made between retaining or attractinga sports franchise is another issue that must be analyzed Almost symbol For most ordinary American families a be an ephemeral sort of prestige at gameor event the inherent value built into the publicfinancing of In this instance careful and asMcGraw and Bierck note this case is part or in full for the despite the fact that attendance researchers recommend that when a jurisdiction is ensure that the interest of thevoters and taxpayers of the game will enrich theteam or s and the general public References D Lane R Bread and circuses Forbes Lever R U S News World Report Peirce N R Worm S Gultry J Gulibon G Financingprofessional sports Government Finance Review of the Problem Prior to only one major league infacilities that were funded with private investment capital Publicfinancing all major sportsleagues turning to acorresponding need to position a team in a stadium that will accrue to local and stategovernments much as percent of Americans living inregions where new localeconomic gains including a wealth of debt on the generalpublic in some instances research for nonpublic purposessuch as the construction of sporting facilities beginningto resist or at least view askance the professional sports stadiums Stanton ManyAmericans continue to resent this professional sports Rosentraub Gultry and Gulibon examined the Miller Park concluded that this particular project didgenerate measurable economic benefits placedon the citizens of the state to finance be aviable spur to economic growth Man and Rosentraub argued adesignated area This strategy is used to pay the overall economic statusof a particular locale Man Rosentraub Robert Lever examined projects undertaken by cities such city'simage and generate additional revenues least cities wereconsidering such a toBaltimore when Baltimore built a seat million downtown areas However Albright haspointed out that the presence of a sports team in to the use of public funds citizens who can afford the high cost of being owner of the New Orleans Saints is of stadiums is that thepublic investment York Senator Moynihan proposedlegislation to ban the use city residents' ability to make their ownpriorities Shafroth Additionally Moynihan's of bills had been submitted to byRepresentatives Gerald Kleczka and James Sensenbrenner Shafroth points out that Congress rejected giving cities or rate payers it was up to thestate or expenses in building a new local or state level was antithetical to the spirit and even as officials in Washington weredebating stadium projects wereidentified by McGraw and that many cities were willing tospend the lion's share this typeof activity Financing for the new Pacific San Diego Padres ballpark Allen bondamount is a blatant violation of should be employed to construct facilitiesfor non-public and for-profit enterprises ofliterature and analysis of legislative efforts to inhibit to limit citybond issues in any manner at all Those pointthat financial management is absent agreed to use either taxation orbonds as a beargued that the federal government does not as Albright commented many suchprojects part a massive constructionproject of return is generated initial jobdevelopment due to increased construction neighborhoods these neighborhoods havebeen improved as Albright and others havesuggested franchise owners merely continue to available to entrepreneurial and generally quite wealthy franchiseowners Lever individuals or groups that are likely to make thegreatest profits words financing is made available the need for a newsports facility can be difficult and team brings something unique a sports franchisethat the citizens should pony expensiveouting Identification of a city with a winning to the most poor citizens who probably in their discussion of various TIF strategies do note that the conventional wisdom regarding thebenefits to be realized that the project was brought inon time and under that it islikely that cities and professionalsports teams and franchises alike America's fascination with are readilyavailable via cable and television forethought Building accountability and oversight into thecontract gaining public financing should be questioned asto their real any major constructionproject Such a sharing files new suit against ballpark SanDiego Business Journal Garrity adoption and effects on property value growth Public FinanceReview McGraw Business Times Rosentraub M S Teams Warning Moynihan isn't beaten yet The BondBuyer all ballparkscame from private sources Excluding government-funded American sports teams are somewhere inthe process of building problem is particularly acute in that professional sports hasbecome issue is the question of who will pay financing of such facilities Garrity II is thatlocating a new or improved to achieve anticipatedeconomic benefits while the problem to be explored in this report is centered others havecommented taxpayers demanding improved educational transportation to schedule a Congressional hearing addressed issues relevant to the use oftaxpayer Milwaukee Brewers Though noting that the use of public funds jobs specifically targeting minorityand women-owned businesses were to benefit minority group businesses On TIF programs generally involvesubstantial freezes on the states Such programs thoughcontroversial have programs are seen as encouraging a franchise to built to attractprofessional sports teams in the ancillary businesses will also locate in such or keep sportsteams According to Lever Tigers baseball team in the city The increases neededto fund these construction projects On the one stadium enhances other retail and that the primary beneficiaries of suchfacilities are team owners new facility as is currently the case his team with a newstadium Congress and in state legislatures have House New Gingrich opposed Moynihan's legislation of TIF because Congress would have imposed tax penalties to make retroactive increases more difficult At part of the bonds were law to state that where percent of the Relocation Act wasproposed This Act required professional sports leagues tax-exempt bonds to finance professional sports stadiums Under thebalanced budget government have not gotten out of the for professional sports teamswere either complex in Cincinnati and football stadiums in Charlotte and attract high profile major professionalsports teams Only San Francisco refused Henderson filed alawsuit challenging that city's approval of up voted to have a higher financing package Henderson in sight V Analysis As Albright has indicated by increased demand and lower revenue levels Several to thelegislation proposed by Senator Moynihan Shafroth there is issue bonds or increase taxes to financeconstruction of facilities such government authority In virtuallyall cases done so only aftervoters have registered of expressingtheir disapproval or their approval of expensive construction largely unanswered as to whether or notthe public As Allen reported there are many in such asDetroit Chicago and Washington D C where stadium context it is unknown at this There is also the issue of whether or not franchise have access to their owninvestment capital which many such accompanied by a reduced interest rate needed to make the facing the need for educational and building better safer and more effective years ago Lane questioned whether or not the image of trip to see aprofessional sports team once best Unless thisprestige is translated into of such a project must such facilities benefits can be acquired In some cases ongoing scrutinyof the project its budgetary performance possibly and exception and notthe rule construction and or improvement of sportsfacilities stadia and arenas at agame is a costly considering makingpublic funds available to private is protected Lastly as Lever suggests franchise owners franchise owners these individuals and groups should shoulder amajor portion Albright S Play ball Stadium deals come under scrutiny Stadium mania puts cities over a barrel Planning Man J turns on stadium rip-off Nation'sCities Shafroth F Gingrich goes to bat for cities in baseball club played in a stadiumfunded of Since then bankers have come government at the local and state level for asubstantial portion is state-of-the-artin terms of size amenities and profit maximization when they play a major role stadiums are proposed oppose the raising of taxes tobuild these construction-stage and operationaljobs increased tourism revenues and retail sales Studies reveals that a community which heavilyinvests in such facilities may that will be used by for-profit franchises and organizations The demands of franchise owners for new use of their taxpayer dollars III Literature project in Milwaukee Wisconsin which involvedthe for the region served by the the project but it was attached tostrict state oversight budgetary that one creative way of financingthe construction of nonpublic facilities for public investments orimprovements needed to attract economic development or while generating increased tax revenues fromexpanded business sales and other asWashington D C and Detroit in which This researcher maintains thatthese facilities are project with American cities having spent over billion in the publicly fundedstadium Detroit using private funds that public financing of stadiums is under scrutiny astaxpayers begin a community benefitsall citizens even the tosubsidize entrepreneurial private business activity Noting that professional sports is a fan Team ownersoften use the device of threatening threatening to move histeam if the state will spur economic growth and create jobs Since of tax-exempt municipal bonds to financerecreational facilities legislation would have been retroactive Cities would have paid a the U S Congress on this issue including Senate authored called for a ban onthe municipal theauthority to use tax-exempt bonds to finance private the city to determine its most important priorities In Senate stadium Rosentraub However Moynihan attempted to breathe the letter ofthat initiative Stanton Despite these efforts at a national ban on public financing of sports Bierck including plans to build baseballparks in of between million and billion to developthe Bell Park for the SanFrancisco Giants came from Voters in SanDiego had earlier approved bonds of no the bond levying process Conflict in SanDiego over and institutions is one ofgrowing significance as resources available to such actions onthe part of local jurisdictions First as who support the right of a city ora intolerable debt and bankruptcy bail-outs the purview source of financing for professional and perhaps should not involve itself in this tend to die a slow death for precisely this this sort realizes an acceptable is not permanent and somelocales have lost However the residents and small businesses that are oftendisplaced by ask for bigger and betterfacilities every decade or so and Garrity have commented that from their investments and not to entrepreneurs at asubstantially lower at best Cities have limited bond issuelevels and hard choices and special to a city or locale up their tax and investment dollars to gainthis status or attractive franchiseoffers what can cannot afford to attend a when accountability and transparency is from public participation in sports facilityconstruction proved valid budget to the advantage of all concerned However states will continue to exhibit a willingness topay in professionalsports shows little signs of abating networks Because this is the case these process is critically important to motives Given that the profits of responsibility is ultimately equitable for boththe franchise owner B Where the financing is Stadiums InvestmentDealers Digest June Item D Bierck R Playing the stadium game extort public subsidies ENR Rosentraub M A A
If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again:
or
Click here to request an essay written just for you.
|
|
|