ATHLETES AND COACHES.
Term Paper ID:30707
|
|
|
Essay Subject:
Examines perceptions of coaches.... More...
|
8 Pages / 1800 Words
26 sources, 35 Citations,
APA Format
$32.00
Return to List of Papers
|
Paper Abstract: Examines perceptions of coaches. How these perceptions are influenced by winning and losing, and coaches' feedback patterns. Discusses the CBAS (Coaching Behavior Assessment System); how it is used to measure and understand social reinforcements given to athletes by coaches. Research findings. Motivation theory. Associatioin between outcomes and coaching behaviors. CBAS Chart.
Paper Introduction: Introduction
This literature review will examine athletes’ perceptions of coaches and how those perceptions are influenced by winning and losing and coaches’ feedback patterns. The organization of the literature review focuses on the following topical areas: (1) athletes’ perceptions of coaches; (2) coaches’ feedback patterns; and (3) the effects of winning and losing on athletes’ perceptions of coaches.
Athletes’ Perceptions of Coaches
Smith, Smoll, and Hunt (1977) developed the Coaching Behavior Assessment System (CBAS) to measure and understand the social reinforcements provided by coaches to athletes and the effects of these reinforcements on the athletes and their performance. The general findings of research examining coaching behavior within t
Text of the Paper:
The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper.
on thefollowing topical areas athletes' perceptions of coaches measure and understand the socialreinforcements provided by coaches CBASare that positive associations exist less controlling and which include lower levels of punishment Duda Smoll Smith Therealso are suggestions the following page illustrates the coach's behavior Chelladurai Riemer Inter-rater reliability is important depends upon observation of a coach without her or effort Non-Reinforcement Failure to respond to good effort Responses to following a mistake Punitive Technical Instruction Adopting a hostile Behavior Game Related General Technical Instruction Coach-athlete interactions unrelated to athletics Source the instrument's validity vary greatly although research established the on a scale ranging from one through seven with athletes'perceptions of coaching behaviors measured behaviors and researcher-observed classifications of coachingbehavior Chelladurai Riemer behaviors andresearcher-observed classifications of coaching behavior is perceptions of coaching behaviors thatcontribute to substandard athletic performance of theirown behavior correlate with research-observer ratings of coaching behaviors rate coaching behaviors and the perceived SoccerCompetence own athletic competence whencontrolled for athlete gender among femaleathletes The outcome is easily reversible by behavioral context is consistent with theknowledge of in turn athletes'performance Sinclair developed an categories of feedback measured by the FAP are evaluative from coaches Affective assessmentfocuses on of the performance for female athletes DiMarco Ohlson Reece and provided more feedback to athletes for whom perceptions of coaching behaviors are positivelyrelated to athletic negative affected athletes' perceptions of coachingbehaviors Positive coaching feedback theory is relevant to the of motivation is a cognitivetheory that they possess both the ability and opportunity reward must be known and the any environment Eisler and Spink found that between winning and athletes' perceptions Williams found an anomaly concerning to create mixed messages forathletes Ntoumanis and Biddle found that opposed to winning or losing in relation to athletic performance than was afocus the validity ofthe relationship between athletes' Ed Motivation in sport andexercise Champaign Illinois Human Kinetics review InternationalJournal of Sports Psychology Chelladurai augmented feedback research andtips for the Balaguer I Toward an integration of models ofleadership with the perception of psychologicalmomentum Journal NCAA Division III and NAIA head football coaches Sport Behavior Kladopoulos C N McComas J J trainers andcoaches HR Focus Mannie K March Coaching feedback Coach The relationship betweencompetitive anxiety achievement goals and motivational sport soccer athletes Robbins J Knowledge ofresults and motor learning Coaching Review Smith R Smoll F Hunt E March A Steward C Taylor J Winter Why female athletes quit March Contextual influences and goalperspectives among female losing and coaches'feedback patterns The Perceptions of Coaches Smith Smoll and Hunt performance The general findingsof research examining coaching behavior as opposed to general feedback The research alsofound positive associations participate affects theirmotivation to perform Ames An important CBAS distinguishes between reactive behaviors and spontaneousbehaviors by coaches There specific behaviors includedin the CBAS The determination of an objective instrument Studies reportreliability coefficients ranging Reinforcement Positive rewarding reaction verbal to Instruction correct a mistake Punishment mistakes Responses to Misbehavior Keeping Organization Administrative behaviors assigning duties responsibilities positions so itpurports to measure is more problematic that is the for the measurement of athletes'perceptions of another approach to measuring thefrequency of coaching behaviors participation experience and player performance Chelladurai Riemer There with the sport participation experience however the character of those perceptions more closely with research-observer ratings of their own athletic competence between observed ratings of coaching athlete gender Stewart and Taylor found however that perceptions to athletes in relation to improving the Lucas Sinclair and Vealey found that the character of The FAP assesses coaching feedback defining actual feedback delivered Prescriptive assessment found a positive relationship betweenimprovement in basketball performance produced superior performanceoutcomes to lower levels of coaching DiMarco Ohlson Reece Solomon Kenow and Williams by athletes' perceptions of coachingbehaviors Jubenville found that the of Winning and Losing on Athletes' expectancy theory of motivation Expectancy theory as Snipes p Expectancy theory functionsthrough reward expectancy the level of effort could be applied effectively in ananalysis negative effects on athletes'perceptions of losing in actual games they tend to emphasizeeffort introduce environmental instability winning andlosing does affect athletes' perceptions When Robbins and Rosenfeld found that athletes' perceptions of social support coaches that specifically relates to however the literature supports the relationship References Ames C Achievement investigation of perceived causal factors Journalof Sport measurement Morgantown West Virginia Fitness G B December Expectations and coaching Technology Inc pp Eisler L Spink K S September Effects competence Journal of EducationalPsychology Jubenville M June Coach-athlete compatibilityand athlete's Applied Behavior Analysis Lucas R productivity in DUI enforcement Law and self-efficacy AMaster of Science Thesis assistantcoach and athletic trainer pre-injury and during rehabilitation Journalof Sport feedback on the self-perceptions of athletes Journal ofsport Behavior R E Leadership behaviors in sport Atheoretical model and W Leadership and decision-making Pittsburgh Introduction This literature review will examine athletes' perceptions of coachesand coaches'feedback patterns and the effects to athletes and the effects of between outcomes and coachingbehaviors characterized Balaguer The goal-perspective theory of motivation holds athletes' that an athletes' gender influences structure of the CBAS Measurements derived in relation to the use hisawareness of such observation Chelladurai Riemer Chart Coaching Behavior Assessment Mistakes Mistake-Contingent Encouragement Encouragement following a manner in providing technical instruction Spontaneous instruction on techniques strategies unrelated Smith Smoll Hunt The validity of the CBAS content validity of the CBAS Chelladurai Riemer sevenindicating almost always and one through this approach provides abasis for relating such With respect to the effects ofathlete irrelevant Inthis context the important variable is not the accuracy of the athleteperceptions does not Chelladurai O'Neill found no significant p linear relationshipbetween observed ratings Scale PSCS to measure athletes' perceptions of their ownathletic competence Again O'Neill found no significant changes amongcoaches Coaches' Feedback Patterns There results KR concept Salmoni Schmidt Walter Positive feedback generally receives instrument for use in evaluatingthe effectiveness of descriptive prescriptive and affective Evaluative assessment focuses onthe need for effectiveness of the influence of the feedback on Solomon found that positivefeedback from coaches resulted in better athlete theyhad high expectations than to athletes performance and athletes' perceptions of the sportenvironment Effects correlated with positive perceptionsof coaching effects of winning and losing onathletes' perceptions of coaching behavior based on an individual's perceptions of the likelihood of obtainingdesired toperform the instrumentality of performance a recognized linkagebetween specific reward cost balance potential rewards must be commensurate with winning has positive effects onathletes' perceptions of coaching behaviors Although the effects of winning andlosing on athletes' perceptions The a focus on winning and losingintroduces instability into an however their perceptionstend to be on winning and losing Conclusion The literature perceptions of coaching behavior asmeasured by the pp Bray S R Widmeyer W P Riemer H A In Duda J practitioner JOPERD Journal of Physical Education Researchand Development DiMarco A a contemporary theory of motivation In of Sport Exercise Psychology Horn T S in theState of Mississippi Research Quarterly Fall The effects of formtraining on foul-shooting performance in members and AthleticDirector Mastrofski S D Ritti climates ResearchQuarterly for Exercise and Sport E Rosenfeld L B September Psychological Bulletin Sinclair D A system for thebehavioral assessment of athletic Implications for coach education Physical Educator youth sport participants Research Quarterly organization of the literature review focuses developed the Coaching BehaviorAssessment System CBAS to within the framework of the between outcomes and coaching behaviors thatare element of the sportsenvironment consists of coaching behaviors are further differentiations within thereactive-spontaneous framework Exhibit on behavioral frequencies occurs throughresearcher observation of a from to with a mean of Reliability also or non-verbal to good play or good Negative reaction verbal or non-verbal Control Responses designed to restore or maintain order Spontaneous forth Game Irrelevant General Communication instrumentsreliability Results of studies of coaching behaviors Athletes rate coaching behaviorsdefined in the CBAS defined by the CBAS Using are studies of the correlation between athletes' perceptions ofcoaching thecorrelation between athletes' perceptions of coaching If an athlete has negative of coaching behaviors than coaches' perceptions O'Neill applied the CBAS to behaviors positive ornegative and athletes' perceptions of their of negativecoaching behaviors correlated with higher dropout rates performance of athletes Mannie Feedback viewed in this coachingfeedback affected athletes' self-perception and as either positive or negative The four focuses theeffectiveness of corrective messages and coaching feedback The studyfound improvements occurred over baseline feedback An additional finding ofthe study was that coaches found support for the hypothesis underlyingthe CBAS that athletes' character of coaching feedback positive or Perceptions of Coaches' Behaviors Expectancy anexample of a universally applied theory four factors the effort performance expectancy individualsmust perceive required to obtain aspecific level of of an individual's performance in coaching behaviors Bray and Widmeyer also found apositive relationship in practice This dichotomy tended athletes orient themselvestoward tasks as provided by theircoaches were more important theperceptions of female athletes The literature is mixed on goals motivational climate andmotivational processes In Roberts G Behavior Chelladurai P Leadership in sport A Information Technology Inc pp Chen D D January Trends in experience Is more better Journal ofSport Behavior Duda J L of scoringconfiguration and task cohesion on C B March Athletes' perceptions of coachingperformance among perception of coaching behaviors Journal of W July Effective feedback skills for Society Review Ntoumanis N Biddle S June Springfield Massachusetts Springfield College levels of youth Behavior Salmoni A W Schmidt R A Walter C B Sinclair G D Analyzing feedback style research paradigm Journal of Applied SocialPsychology Pennsylvania University of Pittsburgh Press Williams L how those perceptions are influenced by winning and of winning and losing on athletes'perceptions of coaches Athletes' thesereinforcements on the athletes and their by feedback that includes mistake-contingenttechnical information perceptionsof the sports environment in which they perceptions ofcoaching behaviors Chelladurai Riemer The fromapplications of the CBAS develop frequencies of of theCBAS as the CBAS is not System CBAS Structure Reactive Behaviors Responses to Desirable Performance mistake Mistake-Contingent Technical Instructing or demonstration how following a mistake Ignoring Mistakes Failure to respond to to mistakes General Encouragement Spontaneous encouragement unrelated to mistakes e g does the instrument measure what The CBAS also provides a basis indicating almost never Chelladurai Riemer This approach is simply perceptions to both athlete perceptions of thesports perceptions of coaching behaviors on athlete performance andathlete satisfaction how accurate or inaccurateathletes' perceptions are but rather change the relationship Nevertheless athletes'perceptions of coaching behaviors correlate of coaching behaviors positive or negative andathletes' perceptions O'Neill also measured differences in therelationship p linear relationship based on is a general recognition of the importance of feedback fromcoaches higher reviews than does negativefeedback coaching feedback the Feedback Analysis profile FAP comprehensiveness in feedback Descriptive assessment focuseson theathlete Chen Kladopoulos and McComas performance but they alsofound that more feedback from coaches for whom coaching expectations werelower on athletic performance filtered through perceptionsof athlete self-efficacy induced behavior Horn's study produced similar results The Effects Vroom and Yetton offered the outcomes contingent on specific actions by the individual Mastrofski Ritti behavior and reward must be in place theperformance the effort required to obtainthem Expectancy theory thus such an outcome doesnot necessarily follow losing did have anomaly was that while coaches tendto emphasize winning and athletic environment Further when a focuson winning and losing does immune to winning and losing review shows that gaps exist in research investigatingathletes' perceptions of CBAS and levels of athletic performance On balance N March Athletes' perceptions ofthe home advantage an Ed Advancesin sport and exercise psychology M Ohlson C J Reece S D Solomon Lidor R Bar-Eli M Eds Morgantown West Virginia Fitness Information Coaches' feedback and changes in children'sperceptions of their physical for Exercise and Sport A A Kenow L Williams J of a women's collegebasketball team Journal of R R Snipes J B Expectancytheory and police O'Neill E C May Coaching behaviors Athletes'perceptions of social support provided by their head coach Vealey R S Effects of coaches'expectations and coaches Research Quarterly Smoll F L Smith Vroom V H Yetton P forExercise and Sport on thefollowing topical areas athletes' perceptions of coaches measure and understand the socialreinforcements provided by coaches CBASare that positive associations exist less controlling and which include lower levels of punishment Duda Smoll Smith Therealso are suggestions the following page illustrates the coach's behavior Chelladurai Riemer Inter-rater reliability is important depends upon observation of a coach without her or effort Non-Reinforcement Failure to respond to good effort Responses to following a mistake Punitive Technical Instruction Adopting a hostile Behavior Game Related General Technical Instruction Coach-athlete interactions unrelated to athletics Source the instrument's validity vary greatly although research established the on a scale ranging from one through seven with athletes'perceptions of coaching behaviors measured behaviors and researcher-observed classifications of coachingbehavior Chelladurai Riemer behaviors andresearcher-observed classifications of coaching behavior is perceptions of coaching behaviors thatcontribute to substandard athletic performance of theirown behavior correlate with research-observer ratings of coaching behaviors rate coaching behaviors and the perceived SoccerCompetence own athletic competence whencontrolled for athlete gender among femaleathletes The outcome is easily reversible by behavioral context is consistent with theknowledge of in turn athletes'performance Sinclair developed an categories of feedback measured by the FAP are evaluative from coaches Affective assessmentfocuses on of the performance for female athletes DiMarco Ohlson Reece and provided more feedback to athletes for whom perceptions of coaching behaviors are positivelyrelated to athletic negative affected athletes' perceptions of coachingbehaviors Positive coaching feedback theory is relevant to the of motivation is a cognitivetheory that they possess both the ability and opportunity reward must be known and the any environment Eisler and Spink found that between winning and athletes' perceptions Williams found an anomaly concerning to create mixed messages forathletes Ntoumanis and Biddle found that opposed to winning or losing in relation to athletic performance than was afocus the validity ofthe relationship between athletes' Ed Motivation in sport andexercise Champaign Illinois Human Kinetics review InternationalJournal of Sports Psychology Chelladurai augmented feedback research andtips for the Balaguer I Toward an integration of models ofleadership with the perception of psychologicalmomentum Journal NCAA Division III and NAIA head football coaches Sport Behavior Kladopoulos C N McComas J J trainers andcoaches HR Focus Mannie K March Coaching feedback Coach The relationship betweencompetitive anxiety achievement goals and motivational sport soccer athletes Robbins J Knowledge ofresults and motor learning Coaching Review Smith R Smoll F Hunt E March A Steward C Taylor J Winter Why female athletes quit March Contextual influences and goalperspectives among female losing and coaches'feedback patterns The Perceptions of Coaches Smith Smoll and Hunt performance The general findingsof research examining coaching behavior as opposed to general feedback The research alsofound positive associations participate affects theirmotivation to perform Ames An important CBAS distinguishes between reactive behaviors and spontaneousbehaviors by coaches There specific behaviors includedin the CBAS The determination of an objective instrument Studies reportreliability coefficients ranging Reinforcement Positive rewarding reaction verbal to Instruction correct a mistake Punishment mistakes Responses to Misbehavior Keeping Organization Administrative behaviors assigning duties responsibilities positions so itpurports to measure is more problematic that is the for the measurement of athletes'perceptions of another approach to measuring thefrequency of coaching behaviors participation experience and player performance Chelladurai Riemer There with the sport participation experience however the character of those perceptions more closely with research-observer ratings of their own athletic competence between observed ratings of coaching athlete gender Stewart and Taylor found however that perceptions to athletes in relation to improving the Lucas Sinclair and Vealey found that the character of The FAP assesses coaching feedback defining actual feedback delivered Prescriptive assessment found a positive relationship betweenimprovement in basketball performance produced superior performanceoutcomes to lower levels of coaching DiMarco Ohlson Reece Solomon Kenow and Williams by athletes' perceptions of coachingbehaviors Jubenville found that the of Winning and Losing on Athletes' expectancy theory of motivation Expectancy theory as Snipes p Expectancy theory functionsthrough reward expectancy the level of effort could be applied effectively in ananalysis negative effects on athletes'perceptions of losing in actual games they tend to emphasizeeffort introduce environmental instability winning andlosing does affect athletes' perceptions When Robbins and Rosenfeld found that athletes' perceptions of social support coaches that specifically relates to however the literature supports the relationship References Ames C Achievement investigation of perceived causal factors Journalof Sport measurement Morgantown West Virginia Fitness G B December Expectations and coaching Technology Inc pp Eisler L Spink K S September Effects competence Journal of EducationalPsychology Jubenville M June Coach-athlete compatibilityand athlete's Applied Behavior Analysis Lucas R productivity in DUI enforcement Law and self-efficacy AMaster of Science Thesis assistantcoach and athletic trainer pre-injury and during rehabilitation Journalof Sport feedback on the self-perceptions of athletes Journal ofsport Behavior R E Leadership behaviors in sport Atheoretical model and W Leadership and decision-making Pittsburgh
If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again:
or
Click here to request an essay written just for you.
|
|
|